naturefunding.org

How we check

A grant you can’t trust is worse than no grant: it costs a week of writing for a deadline that has passed. So every fact here is read from the funder’s own page and shown with the funder’s words and the date we read them.

On this page

Who builds this

naturefunding.org is built and paid for by Restoration Scope, a company that makes monitoring and reporting software for restoration projects. We say so openly because a directory that hides who runs it is hard to trust.

What we list

Funding for nature restoration and conservation projects: forests and land, rivers and wetlands, coasts and the sea, and the species that live there. We list a programme when its own website says who can apply, where and how. A few listings, such as paid tree-planting partnerships, are not grants; their summaries say so.

We leave out, for now:

So a missing funder may simply not be checked yet. Tell us about it and we will look.

Where the facts come from

Each deadline, amount, eligibility rule and region is read from the funder’s own website, or the website of the organisation that runs the programme for it: the call page, the guidelines or the programme page. Next to each fact we show:

A real fact, as it appears on the Rufford Small Grants page:
Amount

£7,000 to £18,000 GBP

Grants range from £7,000 to £18,000.

Checked 1 Nov 2026Source: apply.ruffordsmallgrants.org

Other directories and funding guides are useful for finding funders we have missed. We never copy a listing, a date or an amount from them.

What we never guess

What the labels mean

Is a call open?

Open
Taking applications now, until the deadline shown.
Rolling
Taking applications any time, with no deadline.
Upcoming
Announced, but not open yet.
Closed
The last call we found has passed its deadline. Check the funder’s page for the next round.
No call found
We found no open or announced call on the funder’s page when we last read it.

The finder lists open, rolling and upcoming calls first. Closed and no-call listings sit in a folded list under them, headed “Not open now”.

Funders you don’t apply to directly

Through a partner
You apply to a partner, such as a country programme, not to the funder.
Invitation only
The funder picks its grantees. Don’t send a proposal.

The checked tag

Checked 1 Nov 2026
The last day we read the funder’s page and found the words we quote.
Checked 20 Sep 2026
Over 30 days since that check. Confirm on the funder’s page before you rely on it.

How often we check

  1. Every day, a job reads the funder pages that are due: most every day, the rest every week or month.
  2. If a page still shows the words we quoted, those facts get a new checked date.
  3. If a page changed or can’t be read, the date stays where it was. A change becomes a proposed edit, and it goes live only after a person approves it.
  4. When a deadline date passes, the finder shows the call as closed. It doesn’t compare times of day, so on the last day check the funder’s cutoff time.
  5. After 30 days without a check, the tag turns amber: Checked 20 Sep 2026
  6. After 90 days without a check, the listing leaves the finder until we can confirm it again. Its page stays up, marked out of date.

Most recent check: 1 November 2026.

Corrections

Every programme page has a Report a problem link and, for funders, a Correct this listing link. Both open a pre-filled issue on GitHub, which needs a free account. We change a listing only after checking the correction against the funder’s own page.

For anything else on the site, such as a missing funder or a broken page:

Report a problem

Open data

Our data is licensed CC BY 4.0: you can reuse it, including commercially, if you credit naturefunding.org.

Quotes from funder pages are their authors’ words and are not covered by our licence; we keep them short and always link the source. The code is MIT-licensed and public on GitHub.

Find funding